What is the value of a second reviewer for study selection?

Question

Using a second reviewer throughout the entire study screening process can increase the number of relevant studies identified for use in a systematic review. Systematic review performers should consider using a complete dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included in their review. 18 июл. 2019 г.

What are the benefits of multiple reviewers?

2 or more reviewers ensures:A screening process which can increase the number of relevant studies identified for use in a systematic review thereby ensuring all relevant studies are included in their review.Improved reliability, reproducibility, validity and quality of systematic reviews.Minimized errors.

What does a second reviewer do?

Essentially the second reviewer assesses the same studies identified as the first reviewer, simultaneously and independently to them. They should be using the same data extraction tool and they keep a record of the studies they rejected/ included and the reasons why.

Do you need two reviewers for systematic review?

Background: Although dual independent review of search results by two reviewers is generally recommended for systematic reviews, there are not consistent recommendations regarding the timing of the use of the second reviewer.

How many reviewers are needed for a systematic review?

Use at least 2 independent reviewers. Have the reviewers use the inclusion and exclusion criteria as the basis for their selections. Specify a method to resolve discrepancies (e.g., consensus, third reviewer). Develop a data extraction form based on PICO.

Expert · Answer