How many studies are identified with the use of two reviewers?

Why are there two reviewers for systematic reviews?

Conclusions: Using a second reviewer throughout the entire study screening process can increase the number of relevant studies identified for use in a systematic review. Systematic review performers should consider using a complete dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included in their review.

Can you do a systematic review with 2 studies?

Whereas a meta-analysis requires at least 2 studies, a systematic review can be conducted even without any studies.

How many reviewers are needed for a systematic review?

Use at least 2 independent reviewers. Have the reviewers use the inclusion and exclusion criteria as the basis for their selections. Specify a method to resolve discrepancies (e.g., consensus, third reviewer). Develop a data extraction form based on PICO.

Does a systematic review need more than 1 reviewer?

Most recent answer The primary objective of including two reviewers in the systematic review is to minimize the risk of information bias, selection bias, and bias in the analysis.