How many reviewers are in a systematic review?

Why are there two reviewers for systematic reviews?

Conclusions: Using a second reviewer throughout the entire study screening process can increase the number of relevant studies identified for use in a systematic review. Systematic review performers should consider using a complete dual review process to ensure all relevant studies are included in their review.

How many authors does a systematic review have?

Systematic Reviews need to have more than one author in order to be considered "systematic". A team can help cut down on bias, make judgment calls on allowing articles, and many journals will reject a study if it is labeled systematic review but only has one author.

Are systematic reviews done by one person?

A systematic review cannot be conducted by one person. You need a team that includes: Subject experts with clinical and methodological expertise. Two people to review the results independently.

How many references are in a systematic review?

1- The average number of references for a research paper is 45, with 90% of research papers having between 8 and 102 references. However, this number depends a lot on study design. For instance, a systematic review typically has 49 references while a case report has only 24.