How many papers do I need for a systematic review?

Question

Basically, there is no limit on number of studies for a systematic review. For a meta-analysis, you can practically do it with 2 or more. However, generally speaking, a MA of less than 4 or 5 studies of controversial benefit. 22 сент. 2015 г.

Is 4 papers enough for a systematic review?

There is no minimum number of studies to be included in systematic review, but if one wish to do meta-analysis, at least two studies are required to sum-up the data and synthesis the evidences that will add some new evidence and knowledge in current knowledge.

How many references do you need for a systematic review?

1- The average number of references for a research paper is 45, with 90% of research papers having between 8 and 102 references. However, this number depends a lot on study design. For instance, a systematic review typically has 49 references while a case report has only 24.

What papers should be included in a systematic review?

A systematic review article follows the same structure as that of an original research article. It typically includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references.

How many researchers are needed for a systematic review?

By using an online version, you can allow your co-researchers to have access to the studies. Given that at least 2 researchers will be needed to review the potentially included studies, online citation management allows for easy access by the multiple researchers.

Expert · Answer