How many authors should a systematic review have?
- What is a good sample size for a systematic review?
- Does a systematic review need more than 1 reviewer?
- Can a single author write a systematic review?
- Can a systematic review be done by one person?
What is a good sample size for a systematic review?
When assessing whether sample sizes were adequate, the majority of studies (90-98%) were well powered to detect large effect sizes (2.0 SD) for one mean. However, few studies were adequately powered to detect smaller (and arguably more realistic) effect sizes (0.2-1.0 SD).
Does a systematic review need more than 1 reviewer?
Most recent answer The primary objective of including two reviewers in the systematic review is to minimize the risk of information bias, selection bias, and bias in the analysis.
Can a single author write a systematic review?
Systematic reviews are generally considered a team undertaking, requiring sustained effort from many over time. However, published systematic reviews may have as few as one author, calling into question their methodological rigor.
Can a systematic review be done by one person?
A systematic review cannot be conducted by one person. You need a team that includes: Subject experts with clinical and methodological expertise. Two people to review the results independently.
Related Questions
-
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago -
Anonymous2 weeks ago
Expert answer2 weeks ago