Can HAVING clause be used without aggregate functions?

Is aggregate function necessary in HAVING clause?

The HAVING clause includes one or more conditions that should be TRUE for groups of records. It is like the WHERE clause of the GROUP BY clause. The only difference is that the WHERE clause cannot be used with aggregate functions, whereas the HAVING clause can use aggregate functions.

Which clause is not used with an aggregate functions?

An aggregate function performs a calculation on a set of values, and returns a single value. Except for COUNT(*) , aggregate functions ignore null values. Aggregate functions are often used with the GROUP BY clause of the SELECT statement.

WHERE clause was added because the HAVING clause could not be used with aggregate function?

Having Clause It added in the SQL because WHERE Clause cannot be combined with aggregate results, so it has a different purpose. The primary purpose of the WHERE Clause is to deal with non-aggregated or individual records. HAVING Clause always utilized in combination with GROUP BY Clause.

Is HAVING an aggregate function?

An aggregate function computes a single result from multiple input rows. For example, there are aggregates to compute the count , sum , avg (average), max (maximum) and min (minimum) over a set of rows.